Comments on: What do you think? Oprah

By: Megan Biddinger

Megan Biddinger — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:28:57 +0000

I think that Oprah’s status as something of a spiritual leader is what puts a twist on the otherwise banal question of who or what will come next. Her show is ritualized in the way that so much TV is, but it’s also full of actual rituals, activities that we might go so far as to call sacraments (Confession/penance, annointment). She’s not just cancelling a show, at some level it’s like she’s canceling daily Mass. I don’t mean to ignore the fact that a lot of the “What/who next?” questions are motivated by concerns about potentially lost or displaced revenue. Likewise, I don’t want to overstate Oprah’s significance to all (or any) of her fans. Maybe the question isn’t so much about who will replace Oprah, but how strong is the faith of her fans.

As for Josh’s question, I think we might need to look beyond who is already trusted. Oprah’s been doing her thing for the better part of my lifetime, but she wasn’t the full-blown cultural phenomenon for all of that time. There must be some players at a regional or sub-cultural level, but I can’t point to any right now. It occurs to me that I’ve been reading this decision as the start of her decline, but I suppose we can’t know that for another couple of years.

By: Kelli Marshall

Kelli Marshall — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:37:02 +0000

I’m particularly interested in your comment that “while Oprah not a religion, she is, in many ways, a spiritual figure.” Indeed, like the leaders of the major (and minor) religions, Oprah draws devoted followers. Her actions change people’s lives (they are reborn, so to speak). She communicates easily with the rich and the poor. To many, her words represent “truth,” the light. She created an “Angel Network” for cryin’ out loud. In essence, Oprah is worshipped. With this analogy in mind, it’s definitely interesting to think about how the talk-show queen (savior?) may be replaced… Thanks.

By: Erin Copple Smith

Erin Copple Smith — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:47:02 +0000

I keep thinking about the “who’s going to replace her!?” idea. Why is this such a big issue? Why do we need anyone to “replace” Oprah? It’s not as though she’s the host of a more generalized talk show. Yes, Johnny Carson needed a replacement for The Tonight Show. And Meredith Viera needed a replacement for The View. And Bryant Gumbel for Today. But Oprah’s show is…The Oprah Winfrey Show. How can anyone replace her? “The Oprah Winfrey Show, with Ellen Degeneres”!?

I understand the discussion–the ruminations are related to the forthcoming opening in the 4pm syndicated talk show timeslot. But…still. She’s not being “replaced”–her show simply can’t have a replacement.

By: Josh David Jackson

Josh David Jackson — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:45:03 +0000

Yes, ritual. (Thanks, TV model based around predictable, open-ended, and regularly-scheduled programming!) It’s hard (perhaps impossible) to make predictions about Oprah because she’s such so inimitable. Maybe we can try, though: Who is the most trusted, most beloved popular figure who doesn’t have a daily TV show?