Comments on: Neil Gaiman’s Doctor Who: Fan Service Meets the Junkyard Look http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/05/16/neil-gaimans-doctor-who-fan-service-meets-the-junkyard-look/ Responses to Media and Culture Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:35:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.5 By: Matt Hills http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/05/16/neil-gaimans-doctor-who-fan-service-meets-the-junkyard-look/comment-page-1/#comment-87440 Thu, 19 May 2011 17:03:21 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=9348#comment-87440 Thanks, Andrew, you’re quite right to pick up further on the junkyard setting — Gaiman has referred to this in interviews as a deliberate reference back to Totter’s Lane from 1963’s ‘An Unearthly Child’. But it strikes me that this is an unusual bit of intertextual referencing. It recontextualises what was originally a contemporary, realist environment (in Classic Who) as a fantastical ‘junkyard planet’, simultaneously fitting into the ‘dark fairytale’ remit of Moffat era Who *and* being readable via Gaiman’s author-function as a fantasy writer. And as such,’The Doctor’s Wife’ offers up a very overdetermined junkyard — which fits, too, with Myles’ observation that part of Gaiman’s skill lies in just how shrewdly he combines fan/producer roles.

]]>
By: Andrew O'Day http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/05/16/neil-gaimans-doctor-who-fan-service-meets-the-junkyard-look/comment-page-1/#comment-87420 Thu, 19 May 2011 14:32:41 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=9348#comment-87420 Very interesting discussion, Matt! I thoroughly enjoyed the episode and actually came to it (I’m almost ashamed to admit) without knowledge of Gaiman’s previous work. What interests me is the way your use of the word ‘junkyard’ in the title reminded me of the fact that the very opening episode ‘An Unearthly Child’, from 1963, began with the TARDIS in a junkyard. Although you don’t explicitly mention this point, it seems to tie in with your idea that ‘The Doctor’s Wife’ plays with fan knowledge of the programme in an almost postmodernist way (where fan Steve Manfred was called upon to give his expertise), while reversing things in a weird way. This image of the ‘junkyard’ seems fascinating since the narrative itself is made up of things from the past and I’m curious to hear what wonderful things you can do with the image…

]]>
By: Matt Hills http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/05/16/neil-gaimans-doctor-who-fan-service-meets-the-junkyard-look/comment-page-1/#comment-87056 Tue, 17 May 2011 15:57:51 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=9348#comment-87056 Thanks for your comment, Myles. I think the question of when literary terms are used in relation to TV drama is a really interesting one. (And this felt a bit like a comic book “one-shot” too, even though it had the ‘water in the forest” line attributable to Moffat, and the other arc stuff worked in). Usually, literary terms seem to be used to elevate TV — it’s “novelistic”, and so on.

Given that, what interested me about reading Gaiman’s ep as akin to a “media tie-in” is that this tends to be a (sub)culturally devalued form. Rather than celebrating Gaiman’s genius, or elevating this as a “special” episode, I wanted to restore the context of industrial control, i.e. focus more on Gaiman’s situated agency. And I wanted to play with the notion that televised Doctor Who, even at its most “special”, may not be as distinct from the tie-in novel in terms of working practices and narrative limits as tends to be commonly supposed — at least in the case of a non-showrunner TV writer who’s been brought in as a hired hand.

Gaiman’s storyline inverts the show’s mythology, and I guess my response likewise inverts what I’d see as the standard relationship between ‘quality’ TV drama and the ‘literary’. Hence my pondering what would happen if TV scholarship were to draw self-consciously on *devalued* forms of the novel in its sense-making, rather than seeking to discursively and culturally valorise beloved TV texts.

]]>
By: Myles McNutt http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/05/16/neil-gaimans-doctor-who-fan-service-meets-the-junkyard-look/comment-page-1/#comment-86615 Mon, 16 May 2011 16:20:41 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=9348#comment-86615 A fantastic reading of Gaiman’s contribution to the season, Matt.

I think “short story” was where my mind first went with this episode: of course, the series’ episodic nature means that this term has always been floating around the series, but something about the rehappening of it all made it feel poetic and symbolic in ways I would not normally associate with “episode” as a term. I realize that this is silly, and I usually hate to bring in literary terms to describe television storytelling (especially if it’s subconsciously driven by the author’s previous work), but “short story” just sounded better in my head.

What struck me is the fact that, despite being far from a superfan, I didn’t feel as though the poetry of this story was necessarily dependent on intense fandom. Although the episode was certainly embracing the series’ history, and although little details (like the old control room, which is one thing I caught) called directly to particular elements of that history, the *sense* of history was palpable even without knowledge of it.

Perhaps proof of the value of anthropomorphization, or simply proof of the shrewd fan/producer balance Gaiman is able to strike.

]]>
By: More from the Beeb, Invasion Card give-away, plus even more news, podcasts and reviews | Entertainment Blogs http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/05/16/neil-gaimans-doctor-who-fan-service-meets-the-junkyard-look/comment-page-1/#comment-86612 Mon, 16 May 2011 15:38:23 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=9348#comment-86612 […] has Neil Gaiman’s Doctor Who: Fan Service Meets the Junkyard Look, ‘The Doctor’s Wife’ is a title that plays with fan knowledge. It cites a fake Doctor Who […]

]]>