Comments on: Balancing between “Academy” and “Industry” http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/08/23/balancing-between-academy-and-industry/ Responses to Media and Culture Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:35:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.5 By: Sam Ford http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/08/23/balancing-between-academy-and-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-106337 Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:51:03 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=10298#comment-106337 No problem, Cynthia! It wasn’t really clear to me at the time where/how I was headed forward. As an undergrad at Western Kentucky University, I was interested in journalism…but I ended up getting more and more deeply into pop culture studies. That’s how I stumbled across the Program in Comparative Media Studies at MIT. And, once I got there, they were experimenting with an “applied humanities” approach, marrying the coursework with projects that looked to apply the “media studies” way of thinking to collaborations with non-profits, governments, media producers and brands, etc.

That mindset started my thinking about the intersection between academia and the media industries and allowed me the chance, through the project I worked on at MIT, to consult with several companies, attend industry events, make contacts, etc. Really, the job at Peppercom came about through that network. I found out about the job through someone else who was contacted for it, wasn’t interested, but passed them along to me. And–this is key–it was a company who was really looking to collaborate with me in defining the job. I just consulted with them at first and, seeing it was a good fit culturally, we built the position from there.

I suspect it will remain a bit of an unusual position, but there are also precedents set now. So I think it’s becoming less unusual than it once was. One could point to how anthropologists, for instance, end up with in-house research jobs, etc.

One key is that online communication has given ways for academics and people outside the academy to connect on similar interests and ideas in a way that wasn’t as easy to happen (especially for those of us not based in NY or LA and not attending similar types of in-person events) a few years ago.

]]>
By: Cynthia Meyers http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/08/23/balancing-between-academy-and-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-106280 Fri, 26 Aug 2011 04:36:36 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=10298#comment-106280 I’m fascinated to hear about this career path. Earlier in the decade I was looking for just such a path but didn’t think it existed!
Sam, would you mind explaining a little about how you made your way to this point? What kind of degrees/schools? Non-academic work experiences? Networking with whom & where? Also, do you think there are going to be more opportunities like this, or do you think it will continue to be an unusual kind of position?
I ask about this because my experience was that not having an MBA closed off many possibilities, and having a PhD did not promise to open any. Or have things changed a lot over the past decade?

]]>
By: Sam Ford http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/08/23/balancing-between-academy-and-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-105920 Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:53:29 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=10298#comment-105920 Thanks, Jason, and glad you asked that question. There are certainly times that the way marketing, PR, and corporate communications operates doesn’t always gel with how I think things SHOULD work. Peppercom has made it clear that it’s important to always give our clients the counsel we believe in when we’re asked to weigh in…as consultants soon learn, sometimes clients don’t necessarily do what we advise, but it’s good to say it, nonetheless. I’ve never had to take them up on this, but my bosses have also made it clear that they would never expect me to work on a project that runs counter to my beliefs, if they and I have a difference of opinion.

On the other hand, I do take a bit of pragmatist, “will it make a difference?” approach. There are certainly times where I’d advocate a client do something differently but know they don’t have the budget, the bandwidth, the understanding, the right people in place, etc., to do it, and I’ve thus not spoken up. I’ve consciously tried to bring ways of thinking into our firm–and to see it disseminate out to our clients–in ways that I think will cause positive change, but I also don’t want to be too preachy, either. So, for instance, I don’t ask for a retraction if a client uses the word “viral;” or throw something if I hear someone say something about “leveraging influencers;” even as I try to educate others on why I think such terms are problems.

In that way, it’s perhaps like the philosophy many of us would suggest for teaching: that collaboration needs to set a tone where people aren’t afraid to interact with you; that you commit to learning from others as much as you think you have to teach them; and that you don’t shake fingers at people when they do something that run counter to what you think is right (unless it’s a blatant ethical or moral violation), and lose any chance of people listening to you in the process.

]]>
By: Jason Mittell http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/08/23/balancing-between-academy-and-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-105635 Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:49:31 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=10298#comment-105635 Very nice explanation of your hybrid status and what advantages (& challenges) it brings. One question that comes to mind is what happens when your academic-minded research runs counter to the expectations & mindset of your clients? While you obviously don’t come from a strict political economy, “advertising is evil” perspective, I’m sure that there are times that you want to raise issues or critiques that don’t quite mesh with the billable outcomes. So how do you & Peppercorn negotiate such points of friction?

]]>