Comments on: Upfronts 2012: “Save our Show (On the Industry’s Margins)” http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2012/05/16/upfronts-2012-save-our-show-on-the-industrys-margins/ Responses to Media and Culture Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:35:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.5 By: Katie Margaret http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2012/05/16/upfronts-2012-save-our-show-on-the-industrys-margins/comment-page-1/#comment-202119 Thu, 31 May 2012 18:43:58 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=13045#comment-202119 Hello! After reading your article, I am disappointed that you did not mention GCB! Since the announcement of ABC’s decision to cancel GCB, thousands of fans have signed the online petition at http://www.saveGCB.com and many have gone to twitter and facebook to protest! As I am writing this, our petition has over 64,500 signatures. We are making T-shirts, sending letters and emails, and there are even plans to send a gigantic shipment of Bibles to ABC! Could you possibly do an article on our save GCB movement? We are working very hard! Many thanks
-KMR

]]>
By: Darla Hanger http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2012/05/16/upfronts-2012-save-our-show-on-the-industrys-margins/comment-page-1/#comment-197203 Wed, 16 May 2012 17:01:31 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=13045#comment-197203 I have written many articles on Examiner about Harry’s Law. I have twittered the show and the cast. I have recently Facebooked NBC regarding the huge mistake of cancellation. No responses There are fans doing similar but perhaps the SAVE our SHOW campaign is not well enough known. I remember when “THE PRACTICE” was saved by fans. They should do the same with Harry’s Law. It is sad when money outweighs truth and good quality drama, but it is reality of life.

]]>
By: Cynthia Meyers http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2012/05/16/upfronts-2012-save-our-show-on-the-industrys-margins/comment-page-1/#comment-197187 Wed, 16 May 2012 15:46:40 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=13045#comment-197187 Interesting how these “save our show” campaigns are evolving!

The marginalization of certain kinds of viewers, especially older viewers, originates with the advertisers, of course, who pay different CPMs (cost per thousand) for different audiences. In 2010, Dancing with the Stars had 23 million viewers, advertisers paid an average of $209,000 for 30 seconds of air time (about $9 CPM). American Idol had fewer viewers, 22 million, but advertisers paid about $642,000 for 30 seconds ($29 CPM). Why the difference? the age of the DWTS viewers was older, more female.

The difference in revenues is so wide, despite the similar size of the audience! You can see then how networks might cancel shows with relatively large ratings if the profit margins are affected by low CPMs and high production costs.

Why do advertisers pay so much less for older women than for younger men? Young men are hard to find on network schedules, so advertisers pay a premium for programs that deliver them. And most advertisers assume older viewers are less likely to be swayed by advertising.

So for some of these marginalized older female audiences, some cold comfort: advertisers consider them too smart and resistant to their ads!

]]>