Comments on: “Hope” for Net Neutrality? http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2014/11/13/hope-for-net-neutrality/ Responses to Media and Culture Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:35:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.5 By: Danny Kimball http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2014/11/13/hope-for-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-439391 Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:30:43 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=25000#comment-439391 Thanks for the comment, Karen! I completely agree that Wheeler wants to do the “right thing,” but he’s operating from a definition of “right thing” that is far too mired in industry discourse (both broadband industry and tech industry) to see the forest for the trees. (I really do think he means well and actually don’t think he’s a bad guy— frankly, the “cable and wireless industry stooge” label is a bit unfair, as he was working for them back when those industries were the upstarts fighting against the dominant incumbents which they have now become.)

I think Obama’s plan is the actual right thing, though, and that throwing his weight behind reclassification both shows and shapes its shift from “nuclear option” to politically viable. Wheeler says he thinks that Obama’s plan is “simplistic” and “naive”— that the President doesn’t get how they have to work with the broadband industry to get anything done. But there’s good reason to worry less about convoluted compromises and just make the bold move that needs to be made.

I think the public pressure has made strong net neutrality (including reclassification) a winning political issue, therefore, providing incentives to actually push things in the right direction. I think Obama wants to keep that campaign promise for net neutrality and figures that, after the huge midterm defeat, he has little left to lose— so if you’re gonna go, go all out. That is, the Republican Congress is going to throw a fit over any Open Internet rules the FCC passes (even weak “baby splitting” ones), probably turning those “kill the FCC!” House resolutions into actual bills that make it through the Senate and onto Obama’s desk, which he figures he can then make a big spectacle out of vetoing and fire up the young tech-savvy progressives the Democrats need to actually show up at the polls in 2016. I think Wheeler ought to take a similar approach— Verizon (at the least) is going to sue no matter what he does, so he may as well just go with a common carriage approach that gives stronger legal authority and works closer to net neutrality anyway.

]]>
By: Greeney28 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2014/11/13/hope-for-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-439390 Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:59:06 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=25000#comment-439390 Hey Danny, glad to hear your thoughts about this. I actually was writing about this the other day, and my tone was much more pessimistic. Am I naive, though, to think Wheeler is actually trying really hard? I think he wants to do something good, but I think “good” for him means trying to make everyone happy. Which is folly, of course. I also think he genuinely believes his job is to create an environment that is positive for competition, which means he has to defer to what he perceives as valid concerns of the broadband industry (people that he is depending upon to expand access). Obama came out strong after a devastating defeat–too little too late? Political cover when Wheeler tries to cut the baby in half?

]]>