Project Runway – Antenna http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu Responses to Media and Culture Thu, 30 Mar 2017 23:48:47 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.5 The State of Reality TV: When in the World is Project Runway? http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/02/05/the-state-of-reality-tv-when-in-the-world-is-project-runway/ http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/02/05/the-state-of-reality-tv-when-in-the-world-is-project-runway/#comments Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:32:34 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=8295 Project Runway has made its way to other countries, its scheduling model has been lost in translation.]]> While reality television has made many contributions to the American television landscape, one of its most “revolutionary” may be its cyclical ubiquity. As soon as one season ends, the next season seems to begin; while they may not air dramatically more episodes than broadcast series in the span of a year, at least following the North American model of 22-episode seasons, the constant shifts to new casts means that the entire process keeps repeating: one minute you’re being introduced to a new set of contestants and watching them evolve into characters, and the next thing you know the season is over and you’re already hearing about the great new cast coming up next season.

This is especially true of a show like Project Runway, which in recent years has seemingly been on every time you turn around. Thanks to the series’ forced hiatus as a result of lawsuits regarding its move to Lifetime, Runway aired three seasons – 49 episodes in total – in just 14 months between August 2009 and October 2010. This was exaggerated by the sixth season being “on the shelf” for a lengthy period, and the seventh season being rushed to counteract poor viewer response to the franchise’s Lifetime debut, but the series’ omnipresence is demonstrative of general trends within the genre (if in an exaggerated form).

However, the same period has been marked by the absence of two of the series’ most prominent international spinoffs: both Project Runway Australia (2008-Present) and Project Runway Canada (2007-2009) debuted in their respective countries to relative success, earning second seasons and, in the case of the Canadian version, even moving from a niche cable outlet to a national network. Each show largely followed the formula of the American series, with a famous fashion model host (Kristy Hinze in Australia, Iman in Canada), a fashion industry mentor, and a collection of celebrity guests and judgmental observers to complete the package.

The basic format of the series may have remained intact when the show made its way to other countries, but the scheduling model has been lost in translation. Both the Australian and Canadian series aired only one season per year, and both dealt with substantial hiatuses: this is particularly true for the Australian series, which has been off the air for nearly two years. While America’s love affair with reality television has had international ramifications when formats like Project Runway which originated in the U.S. are spread to countries around the world, the way in which the series are scheduled seems to have been considerably less influential internationally.

Some of this certainly has to do with simple industrial realities. American cable networks have the luxury of appealing to niche audiences, with networks like Bravo and Lifetime able to position shows like Project Runway as signature series designed to deliver female viewers to their advertisers. International producers, meanwhile, are working with less industrial infrastructure in general, and most likely less in the way of targeted cable networks that seem a fit for narrowcast reality programming as well. They simply don’t have the resources to schedule two seasons in a single year, which makes emulating the American schedule more challenging.

However, I find myself curious if there are more cultural reasons for the vast proliferation gap between Project Runway and its international adaptations. If we look at the vast array of versions, the longest-running has been the United Kingdom’s Project Catwalk, which lasted three seasons from 2006-2008. While I haven’t seen the series, I do wonder whether its relative longevity stems from the prominence of London as one of the world’s fashion capitals, at least relative to Melbourne or Toronto. Even within the American series, location and setting seem to play a prominent role: viewers and critics alike panned the series’ move to Los Angeles in Season Six, prompting Lifetime to promote the return to New York as the defining feature of the seventh season. Perhaps the same principle applies internationally, and certain locations can only sustain a couple of seasons before fading away into local pop culture history.

And yet, some part of me wants to believe that this may be a purposeful choice on the part of international producers. While these changes are perhaps facilitated by concerns over financial commitments and cultural limitations, there seem to be creative benefits to this scheduling model. Personally, despite having seen countless seasons of the American series beforehand, both the Canadian and Australian versions felt remarkably novel. The format was more or less the same, but the wait between seasons made their introductions more eventful, and their conclusions more effectively bittersweet. The return of the American series feels like routine, but is reality television not (like television in general) more effective – and affecting – when we anticipate its return with baited breath?

With a new host secured, Project Runway Australia will return for its overdue third season later this year (although on a new network). In an era where the American version has shifted to overstuffed 90-minute episodes and barely takes a breath before plunging into a new season of “making it work,” there is something wonderfully refreshing about the notion of Project Runway being a scarce commodity; it’s too bad, then, that most American viewers rarely get to experience such a feeling.

Share

]]>
http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2011/02/05/the-state-of-reality-tv-when-in-the-world-is-project-runway/feed/ 2
What Do You Think? Consuming Media in Public http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2010/03/29/what-do-you-think-consuming-media-in-public/ http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2010/03/29/what-do-you-think-consuming-media-in-public/#comments Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:30:10 +0000 http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/?p=2753 It’s March Madness, and that’s gotten the Antenna editors thinking about what it means to consume media in public.  At the SCMS conference, Antenna’s own Jeff Jones and Tim Anderson were spotted as they searched for someplace to watch a game.  And at least one of our Facebook feeds has featured a friend mentioning that she seems to spend all of March at a local bar so she can see her alma mater play, even though that school is hundreds of miles from her current home.  And bars nationwide are running special promotions to entice sports enthusiasts to view the game there instead of one of the other 324098 bars in town.  Without question, March seems to bring the crowds out in droves to watch “the game” (whichever game “the game” is at that moment) with others.

But what does it mean to consume our media in public?  In a time when so much is being made of the ability to watch TV on our big screens in the privacy of our own homes, or on miniature screens in the public setting of the doctor’s office or bus, what is it that makes us want to consume media together?

So we want to hear from you–what entices you to watch Project Runway at group viewing nights in clubs?  Or to attend a group sing-along for Rocky Horror or The Sound of Music?  What are the pleasures of consuming your media in public?  Tell us your stories and analyze your behavior below…

Share

]]>
http://blog.commarts.wisc.edu/2010/03/29/what-do-you-think-consuming-media-in-public/feed/ 7